Former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton has made a compelling assertion, highlighting that the approval of a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) is becoming increasingly ‘hard to resist’. Clayton’s remark underscores the growing pressure on regulatory authorities to acknowledge the undeniable progress and institutional support surrounding cryptocurrencies.
In a recent interview with CNBC, Jay Clayton expressed his surprise and admiration for the growing involvement of blue-chip firms in the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency market. Clayton, who served as the SEC Chairman from 2017 to 2020, highlighted the significant progress the crypto market has made since its early days and commented on the evolving perception of Bitcoin among institutional investors. Additionally, he hinted at the potential approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF if the market demonstrates similar efficacy to the futures market.
A Market Transformation
Reflecting on the evolution of the crypto market, Clayton compared its current state to the offshore, retail-dominated market that existed in 2015-2016.
He acknowledged that Bitcoin, at the time, looked like stocks but lacked the infrastructure and regulatory frameworks associated with traditional financial markets. However, Clayton noted that the landscape has dramatically shifted, with established companies now endorsing Bitcoin and offering related products.
This development, according to Clayton, is remarkable and not something he anticipated during his tenure as SEC Chairman.
“The fact that we have these institutions that know markets better than anybody and saying we’re going to put our reputation behind it, I find that pretty remarkable, he explained.
Institutional Confidence
Clayton specifically pointed out the decision of reputable institutions to associate their names with Bitcoin-related products, highlighting their confidence in the market’s trading, custody, and overall security. This newfound trust from established companies represents a crucial endorsement of the legitimacy and maturity of the cryptocurrency market.
“Now we’ve seen … companies whose reputation in the market matters are saying … that trading, … the custody, … protections around this market are sufficient that we’re willing to put our name on it and not that product. That’s actually an incredible development,” Clayton said.
Clayton acknowledged that his skepticism towards trading Bitcoin stemmed from concerns about wash trading, manipulation, and large-scale dumping. However, he expressed admiration for institutions that recognized the market’s improvements and were willing to back it with their reputations.
The Road to a Spot Bitcoin ETF
When asked about the possibility of a spot Bitcoin ETF, Clayton highlighted the SEC’s previous decision to approve a futures-based ETF while expressing concerns about the spot market’s lack of regulatory protections.
He stated that institutions are arguing that the distinctions between the futures and spot markets have diminished and that the spot market, being more efficient, should be considered for approval.
“What the institutions are arguing is those distinctions have gone away and now the spot product is less drag, more efficient for the investors,” he said.
Clayton suggested that if the market could demonstrate similar efficacy to the futures market, it would be challenging for the SEC to resist approving a Bitcoin ETF.
“What I would say is if they’re right, that you can demonstrate that the market has similar efficacy to the futures market, it would be hard to resist approving a Bitcoin ETF, he added.
The Regulatory Process
Regarding the timeline for a potential Bitcoin ETF approval, Clayton emphasized that the regulatory process takes time. While he did not provide a specific timeframe, his statement implied that it has already been a considerable period. However, he emphasized the importance of demonstrating market efficacy and highlighting the market’s similarities to the futures market in terms of investor protections.
Jay Clayton’s comments shed light on the changing perceptions and increasing institutional involvement in the cryptocurrency market, particularly Bitcoin. Moreover, Clayton’s suggestion that a Bitcoin ETF could receive approval if the market demonstrates efficacy comparable to the futures market hints at a potential shift in the SEC’s stance. While the regulatory process may still take time, these developments signal a growing recognition of Bitcoin’s legitimacy and potential for broader adoption in traditional finance.
Read Also: Larry Fink Embraces Bitcoin as an International Asset
