Key Takeaways
- The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) advocates for crypto oversight to be divided among various regulatory bodies based on the nature of the digital asset.
- This approach contrasts sharply with the India’s central bank more conservative stance, which continues to view cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins, as a macroeconomic risk.
- SEBI is open to overseeing digital assets that resemble securities and proposes regulating Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) and other equity market-related products.
In a significant development for the future of cryptocurrency in India, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has proposed a multi-regulator framework for overseeing cryptocurrency trading. This position, revealed in documents submitted to a government panel, represents the most open stance yet from an Indian authority towards private virtual assets. However, it contrasts sharply with the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) persistent calls for stringent restrictions, highlighting a deepening regulatory divide. This information was reported by Reuters, marking a pivotal moment in India’s ongoing cryptocurrency debate.
Why does it matter? While the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) continues to express deep-seated concerns, highlighting cryptocurrencies as a macroeconomic risk, SEBI’s contrasting position suggests a potential softening in the regulatory framework governing digital assets. These developments have emerged from internal documents submitted to a government panel responsible for crafting policy recommendations for the finance ministry.
Historically, India has maintained a stringent regulatory posture toward digital currencies.
The RBI’s 2018 ban on cryptocurrency transactions through banking channels, although overturned by the Supreme Court in 2020, reflects persistent apprehensions about the integration of such assets into the formal financial system. The central bank’s resistance is further underscored by its recent push for a prohibition on stablecoins, which are designed to offer stability by being pegged to fiat currencies.
Despite these challenges, SEBI’s latest submissions suggest a more compartmentalized regulatory vision.
The board proposes that various agencies oversee different aspects of cryptocurrency operations that align with their respective domains. For instance, SEBI itself would monitor digital assets resembling securities, including new ventures like Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). It also proposes issuing licenses for equity market-related cryptocurrency products, mimicking regulatory frameworks like those in the United States, where the Securities and Exchange Commission oversees similar jurisdictions.
This approach is complemented by suggestions that other specialized entities, such as the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) and the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA), should manage insurance and pension-related digital assets, respectively.
Yet, the RBI remains a significant dissenting voice. In its report to the panel, it raised concerns about the potential for tax evasion and the risks associated with decentralized peer-to-peer (P2P) cryptocurrency transactions, which depend heavily on voluntary compliance.
The central bank also pointed out the possible loss of “seigniorage” income, the profit that accrues to a government when it issues currency at a cost exceeding its production.
This divergence in regulatory philosophy underscores the broader dilemma faced by India’s financial authorities: balancing innovation with financial stability. As SEBI advocates for a structured yet flexible regulatory environment, the RBI’s caution reflects fears of fiscal instability and the systemic risks posed by an unregulated expansion of digital currencies.
The Indian government’s evolving stance, highlighted by its recent initiative to tax cryptocurrency transactions and mandate local registration for crypto exchanges, suggests a readiness to engage with this complex asset class, albeit cautiously.
As the panel moves to finalize its recommendations by June, the interplay between innovation and regulation will be critical in determining the trajectory of India’s digital finance landscape.
With 31 countries already regulating cryptocurrency trade, India’s final policy decisions will not only impact domestic markets but could also influence global standards for cryptocurrency regulation. As stakeholders await clarity, the balance between fostering innovation and ensuring financial security remains the central challenge.
Read Also: Industry Leaders Hopeful for India’s Lead Role In Shaping Global Crypto Regulations
