The recent approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reignited debates surrounding the cryptocurrency’s viability and societal implications. While proponents herald the decision as a milestone for legitimizing Bitcoin investments, dissenting voices caution against overlooking fundamental flaws and risks associated with the digital asset.
In a scathing critique titled “ETF approval for bitcoin – the naked emperor’s new clothes,” published on the European Central Bank (ECB) official website, authors Ulrich Bindseil and Jürgen Schaaf, rebuke the notion of Bitcoin as a reliable investment or a functional currency. They argue that despite regulatory greenlights and market rallies, Bitcoin remains inherently flawed, with its fair value still hovering at zero.
Why it matters: Ulrich Bindseil is the Director General Market Infrastructure & Payments, and Jürgen Schaaf is Adviser Market Infrastructure & Payments at European Central Bank.
The big picture: The European Central Bank (ECB) is one of the world’s most important central banks and plays a crucial role for the Eurozone’s economic stability. It sets monetary policy to maintain price stability, supervises financial institutions, and supports economic growth by facilitating borrowing and investment. Additionally, the ECB manages the euro’s currency and foreign reserves, acts as a lender of last resort during crises, and maintains independence from political influence. Its actions influence not only the Eurozone’s economies but also global financial markets, making it a critical institution for ensuring the stability and prosperity of the region.
State of play: In 2021, European Central Bank launched a eurozone CBDC project – Digital Euro – due to the growing demand for cryptocurrency globally. The Digital Euro is a form of digital currency proposed by the European Central Bank (ECB) as a complement to physical cash and existing forms of electronic money. Designed to facilitate digital transactions within the Eurozone, it aims to enhance financial inclusion, streamline payments, and adapt to the evolving landscape of digital finance while maintaining regulatory oversight and consumer protection.
Bitcoin has failed to fulfill its initial promise of serving as a global decentralized digital currency, according to the ECB officials. They highlight the inefficiencies in Bitcoin transactions, noting their slow, costly, and inconvenient nature, which largely confines their use to the darknet for criminal activities. This observation undermines the vision of Bitcoin facilitating widespread, legitimate payments.
Despite efforts such as the government-backed initiative in El Salvador to promote Bitcoin adoption, its practical utility in mainstream transactions remains minimal. Moreover, Bitcoin’s volatile nature and lack of intrinsic value make it an unsuitable investment vehicle, particularly for retail investors lured by the fear of missing out.
Central to the critique is the environmental toll exacted by Bitcoin mining, which continues unabated despite mounting concerns over energy consumption required by the proof of work mechanism. This aspect is particularly concerning given the increasing awareness and urgency around environmental sustainability. The officials argue that the energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining is unjustifiable, especially when considering Bitcoin’s limited practical utility and social benefit.
The officials highlight the irony of a digital currency purportedly challenging established financial systems relying on conventional intermediaries for broader investor access.
The critique extends to Bitcoin’s role as an investment asset. The ECB officials are skeptical of Bitcoin’s value proposition, pointing out that unlike traditional assets such as real estate, stocks, or commodities, Bitcoin does not generate cash flow, dividends, or offer productive use. This perspective challenges the rationale behind investing in Bitcoin, suggesting that its market value is driven more by speculative fervor than by inherent worth.
They also raise concerns about the societal risks associated with a potential Bitcoin bubble, exacerbated by regulatory endorsements such as the SEC’s approval of Bitcoin ETFs.
While the recent price surge following the ETF approval may buoy investor confidence temporarily, the authors caution against misplaced optimism. They argue that structural issues, including price manipulation, illicit use in criminal activities, and regulatory oversights, pose significant long-term risks to Bitcoin’s stability and credibility.
The officials caution against the speculative nature of Bitcoin investments, highlighting the risk of significant financial losses for less knowledgeable investors drawn in by the fear of missing out (FOMO).
Despite these criticisms, Bitcoin has experienced a significant recovery in its market value, a phenomenon the authors attribute to temporary factors such as changes in interest rate policies and the halving of Bitcoin mining rewards. They suggest that these factors, while influential in the short term, do not alter Bitcoin’s fundamental lack of intrinsic value.
The Truth: Detached from economic fundamentals every price is equally (im)plausible – a fantastic condition for snake oil salesmen, the officials warned.
The bottom line: The article underscores the need for robust regulatory measures to address Bitcoin’s negative externalities effectively. Despite recent developments such as the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA) in Europe and increased scrutiny from authorities, challenges persist in mitigating Bitcoin’s adverse impacts on society and the environment.
Read Also: SEC Approves Spot Bitcoin ETFs, But Does Not Endorse Bitcoin: Gary Gensler
